So much strife from a single word
. Instead of saying objective and subjective when referring to the aspects, you can replace the terms with defined and undefined, explicit and implicit, external and internal etc. and it means the same thing. You could even use clear and fuzzy or other terms you like better.
Reworded definitions of the aspects:
Ti: Defined static connections between objects
Fi: Undefined static connections between objects
Si: Defined dynamic connections between objects
Ni: Undefined dynamic connections between objects
Te: Defined dynamics of objects
Fe: Undefined dynamics of objects.
Ne: Undefined statics of objects
Se: Defined statics of objects
In socionics aspects, extroversion/introversion doesn't mean external vs internal, it means objects vs fields. Fields are the spaces and connections between objects. All of the elements are mental processes that are represented by these aspects, so if you're concerned about an internal process being called "objective" then none of them can be. But object vs field or object vs spatial is a pretty well-known and studied topic outside of socionics. For example:
LINK
Anyway, the extroverted elements are focusing on the characteristics of individual objects and the introverted elements link objects together. The element definitions diverge from Jung and MBTI going more in a information processing direction, but some socionicists prefer to stick closer to Jung so you'll see different applications by author.
edit: