Click 'like' if you agree.
Click 'constructive' if you strongly agree.
Click 'like' if you agree.
Click 'constructive' if you strongly agree.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Yeeeeeeees girl, you give me life. Finally. It's time.
Make me reasonable and enough arguments - and I'll do.
i'd watch it. cock in hand.
I'm old school. When a lady have interest to me and I to her, - then we meet IRL. No camera may transfer my charm.
To fit "enough" you'll need to do it many times.
Until she'll unground herself, I may don't worry.
It's pleasure to see how others accept my wisdom.
> Indeed, a woman does usually get somewhat looser over time. You just have to plough her regularly.
All you need is love, Cuivienen, then you'll not be perceived as a looser by a woman. In other case you'll become boring for both you sometimes, despite your and her qualities.
Do not flatter yourself; you have neither intelligence nor wisdom.
I would much rather that you just insulted me without these pretenses of sympathy. You dislike me, so don't pretend to care about me. You clearly lack the courage to express your true feelings directly, but I will not suffer to receive slight after slight. You are a conceited, conniving wretch of a man; the kind that would be pissed upon if we had any honor here.
Your wisdom is just not enough to understand that if you agree with me, then you think me as having wisdom there.
The other your mistake is to say the human with whom you may talk has no intelligence, and hence you controvert to yourself here too.
Also you may notice that my intelligence in logics, as is seen here, is higher than yours.
As you reject evident things, I assume that your intelligence now is not in adequate enough state to continue our discussion. I hope some meds, rest and the reading the words of my Wisdom and Intelligence will make significant improvement on you sometimes.
Also it was interesting to see again, how bad is your T to confirm my opinion about your type and to dispose the opinions of your recent and of someones who may still think you as T type.
Thanks for the pleasure to see you agree with me, at least in what your mental state and intelligence abbilities allow you now.
Keep us informed about how your mental improvement is going. We'll be worry.
P.S. The removing of anger-depressive mask from your avatar that shows your current emotional issues may become a step to your future health.
Not. But the situation is similarly unequal.
I don't ask to identify my type.
And >90% people on forums have much lesser typing experience (which also fits to theory) than me, so my opinion has other weight to interest them. If I see someone's behavior is strange for the said type and offer to make typing thread with video, there is good chance the type is other indeed. I also say arguments in such cases sometimes. Chae, Cosmic Teapot, lavos, etc. - behave strangely for the types in their profiles. And to make a video to be sure in their type is not hard for them. They may get problems from own wrong types, I offer them help.
P -ersonally, it would be nice to see you
A -gh seriously, everyone's tired when you don't practice what you preach literally everywhere on this hellsite
Y -es you have to expose yourself
B - ecause we want to check out your nonverbals
A -and stick to your own rules please while you do that
C -hae demands it, period
K -idding, do what you want but 13 votes and growing should be a good point
That is a photo, you know, not a video. You can't see people moving around on a photo.
In that specificy case. There is not much about what the fire fighters can do. The house – made of wood – is on full fire. Their priority is to prevent that houses nearby catch fire.
The house and the inventory is lost anyway. Wooden constructions on full fire are difficult to extinguish.
I added some further explainations to my privious post, Chae.
I meant my profit.
> A -gh seriously, everyone's tired when you don't practice what you preach literally everywhere on this hellsite
Because I have no doubts in own type. I ask video in a hope the other person will get or has such doubts.
> Y -es you have to expose yourself
This place is for thoughts' exposion.
> B - ecause we want to check out your nonverbals
I send my condolences, but do not notice my profit still. There are LSE examples in my bloggers list. And I'm not against others thought me as wrong type - this gives lols me often.
> A -and stick to your own rules please while you do that
there are not bad examples already
> C -hae demands it, period
and such Chae have made another hopeless demand in her life
> K -idding, do what you want but 13 votes and growing should be a good point
when you'll gather 100k votes then I'll think. I promise
Last edited by Sol; 10-28-2017 at 12:36 AM.
You just have them not enough the get the answer on this question.
lungs offered $1. Just calculate wages of director , writer , operator , acting , post-production , etc. And that all should be me. *huh*
This costs more. I just can't work without profit, I'm not a philanthropist here.
yep. not hard, - senseless
> anyone could argue that they are a better typer than you
In this asylum you may have own typing theme near other one where you try to type someone and disagree with typing of those who does this for many years. But adequate people which may doubt in own type should doubt in own skills too, and take into account for how much and long I type to assume my opinion as interesting. While those who don't doubt will not make video anyway.
Why essentially do you think people here want you to make a video, though?
The thing is, there are quite some people on here who've also done Socionics for many years. In this ummm, asylum it's not that special to have been at it for long years.> anyone could argue that they are a better typer than you
In this asylum you may have own typing theme near other one where you try to type someone and disagree with typing of those who does this for many years. But adequate people which may doubt in own type should doubt in own skills too, and take into account for how much and long I type to assume my opinion as interesting. While those who don't doubt will not make video anyway.
Okay I wasn't sure if you were taking it as some bad kind of "teasing". Just because of your responses.
Yeah, some don't know their own type for sure, but some do.> The thing is, there are quite some people on here who've also done Socionics for many years.
And some of such still may doubt in own type. I offer them too, when see possibilities for mistake.
Some are sure now, but may mistake and become unsure tomorrow.
There is so called International Socionics Institute in Kiev with founder Bukalov. That Bukalov thinks himself as ILE. Just look at this shy and quiet "ILE".
There was Lytov, who made a lot Socionics stuff and after many years accidently changed the opinion about own type ILE->LII.
There was Popov, who recently have changed opinion EIE->IEE.
Those were not just "dudes from the forum". They made researches, studed others, typed a lot, etc.
So when I get doubts in anyone's type there is sense to say them to check it.
Yes. If sol made a video, I'll do one
Like extraverts can never have social anxiety??
(I didn't check the video btw)
Oh I read Meged&Ovcharov started going crazy and started typing everyone with any significant role in society (or whatever it was) as ILE or EIE. Something like this, anyway. Sure, anyone can go crazy like this.There was Lytov, who made a lot Socionics stuff and after many years accidently changed the opinion about own type ILE->LII.
There was Popov, who recently have changed opinion EIE->IEE.
Those were not just "dudes from the forum". They made researches, studed others, typed a lot, etc.
So when I get doubts in anyone's type there is sense to say them to check it.
Even you. Maybe you wake up tomorrow and start typing as IEI.
Extraverts don't have clear and stable nonverbal of introverts. You may find other his clips, - he looks same anywhere, - shy and quiet, not as having just anxiety.
> Maybe you wake up tomorrow and start typing as IEI.
Sometimes, when the ones who thinks own type as IEI saw my examples they said like "ah. Sol again types any pretty and stupid looking chick as IEI"
I don't think I'll spend time trying to figure Bukalov's correct typing. I'm simply saying it's not as simple as you previously said how someone being shy can only be an introvert. There are more factors affecting social or other (e.g. sensory) sensitiveness than that.
Lol> Maybe you wake up tomorrow and start typing as IEI.
Sometimes, when the ones who thinks own type as IEI saw my examples they said like "ah. Sol again types any pretty and stupid looking chick as IEI"
Honestly, Sol is one of the few people on this forum whose type is clear to me without video evidence. I ask more for my personal amusement.
It needs only several minutes of watching his nonverbal to be sure in his introversion.
> I'm simply saying it's not as simple as you previously said how someone being shy can only be an introvert.
If nonverbal of someone gives sure impressions for introversion, including of shy and quiet like I said befor - he's introvert with high possibility, in case you have not bad typing skills by nonverbal.
> There are more factors affecting social or other
I said about nonverbal only and it's enough to be sure in his type. To exclude the high anxiety as the factor for those impressions there is enough data too. Also, generally at least, extraverts with high anxiety would not look as introverts, - they'd look affraid and excited, but not as "shy and quiet".
I suppose both sides have said all they had about this.
You should do it because you're always pestering everyone else to do it, @Sol. What's good for the gander is good for the goose!