Yeah @Number 9 large mobilizes me alright
SX first types (esp the Sensors) often seem to be an image type (esp 3) without necessarily being so. It has something to do with the desire to be sexually attractive to the preferred sex. Image types' fixation with their outside appearance is more complex, or ironically more "superficial"; their image is like a mask they wear.
If you see the most attractive, bright and enigmatic woman - it's... your conflictor.
no. all stuff was taken by Beta, already
> FWIW, if a woman actively chases me, as opposed to simply saying Yes (mostly) to my suggestions for closer relations, I tend to panic
Se types treat like "victims" anyone. it's better to relax and get pleasure
> Hence, I want to do the chasing. Absolutely at first. But I also want the chasing to be accepted and reciprocated.
LIE show how competent, smart and friendly they are. then be prepared for her jump
you just... you just mistyped them!
The amount of butthurt is highly proportional to the amount of (valued) Fi someone possesses.
Actually, many gay guys are Fi ego...
Se and Te are the stereotypical "alpha male" IEs.
So naturally, many women find ESxp and ExTj men attractive, no matter their own type.
P.S.: That also explains why many INxx men are having a hard time attracting their Dual.
Type 4s are easy to spot. They're the typical weirdos a la emo or gothic aesthetics.
4w5s often dye their hair darker when it's not naturally so; black is common. 7s with a 4 fix and some 3w4 often like to go rainbow. 4w3 is somewhere in between, like going for a deep burgundy red, or alternating between dark and bright. This can also apply to some 3w4s.
So yeah, that chick with blue hair has 4 in her tritype somewhere.
Self proclaimed "sapiosexuals" are either Ethicals looking for a Logical, or Logicals looking for an Ethical who's into Logic. For the most part. A few Logical sapiosexuals actually look for a fellow Logical.
Many Sp/Sx guys mistype as Sx/Sp just because they are very horny and Sp first descriptions (which are mostly Sp/So-like) sound "boring" and not "edgy" enough.
Having the same instinctual stacking as someone else can give you the feeling you're of the same Quadra.
Because you have the same instinctual values. Duh.
You keep doubting the validity of Socionics? Or your own type?
Type 6 confirmed.
(Core > wing > fix.)
6s doubt everything, man.
can someone explain how core wing fix works? I've seen "x fix" get thrown around a lot but have never seen an article on it
The vast majority of "sugar babies" and "golddiggers" is Gamma SF, SP instinct first or second.
And yeah, a lot of "sugar daddies" are Te ego, particularly LIE-Te.
er yeah, I get that its a series of three numbers but what is the significance of being it in each slot versus the other or not at all? in other words how does the slot influence how the number is manifest
oh I see so its just there to break out a dynamic, like if I say I'm 1 with a 6 fix it just means I mainly act like a 1 but i fall back into 6 occasionally... "x fix" doesn't actually mean anything special except to say "when I'm being influenced by my least used center I go to this version of it"
Cass's typing skills are based off stupid stereotypes & thinks she knows everything
That's the only Socionics For Dummies tip I got 4 y'all
Aggresively pursuing a female all the time is not a good strategy.
When someone claims to be "ambiverted" and/or they cannot decide between being E or I, they are most likely the Contact subtype.
Lmao not really. Just don't like when people think they are above everything. Does this - "The existence of a positive feeling can be inferred only indirectly, as it were. Its aim is not so much to accommodate to the objective fact as to stand above it, since its whole unconscious effort is to give reality to the underlying images" ring a bell?
Sounds like Jung. It's terrible English. I'd rather read the German original, though even that can be overly complicated.
Jung is certainly not a Logical type. He's unclear af. Te PoLR. None of his theory is factual and evident.
He's IEI-Ni.
its obviously Jung but Im curious as to what type its describing, sounds like introverted feeling but perhaps not