Back to basics darlings:
SLI meets IEE and they hit it off on the first date. What would be the most typical way for SLI to proceed?
Back to basics darlings:
SLI meets IEE and they hit it off on the first date. What would be the most typical way for SLI to proceed?
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
SLI will ignore the IEE until the IEE presses for contact. Then, the SLI will ignore the IEE some more, until the IEE gets in the SLI's face. Then the SLI will grudgingly go out with the IEE, but only if the IEE shows the SLI a good time, like a party with a lot of people. (Especially good is if the SLI can show what a great person they are to the crowd. Family get-togethers might work for this.) Then the SLI will go back to the main task of conserving his time and resources, until the IEE presses for contact again.
Rinse, repeat.
What in the world does the IEE see in the SLI? Someone who is dependable, sensible, and is always able to bring the required resources to the task.
What does the SLI see in the IEE? Someone who finally appreciates and respects the SLI for the incredibly capable person they believe themselves to be.
Maybe he will think about you and not call. But SLI tend to be quite mentally independent, so it would probably depend on what their Si picks up in the ether, whether they wait and see or take further action
I think my longest relationship was with an SLI (4 years). I couldn't really tell if he was interested at first, but after a few dates I was giving some sort of pressure and he told me directly that he liked me. Nevertheless, I basically had to drive everything forward for the first couple months, and then an odd circumstance found us pooling resources and living together, so things got more familiar fast. I expect subsequent details will be unusual thus useless to you
He technically asked me out, but seemed more casual about it than he was—"do you want to get drinks..." /promptly sits at crowded bar when I was under 21. He didn't call it dating until after we started living together. Ips may be similar in expecting impetus to begin outside themselves, and I think Si bases want you to see something in them (I don't know if you're supposed to say this, but my ex responded positively when I told him we could stably continue a relationship for quite some time). He especially didn't rush to bed, but that may have been due to bad experiences in his past. He didn't like any restrictive or possessive behavior, which I occasionally exhibited, but he had a surprisingly positive response to being invited to spend 1:1 time—despite 'mean mugging' or whatever most of the time, he was very openly happy when I politely asked to decrease distance
One more thing.. he appreciated intelligence and good humor. When he told me he worked in audiovisual, I sneered and asked if he worked at Blockbuster. He found that tremendously amusing
My experience was similar to 666s. He played it cool for awhile, but not in a flaky way. Was unawkwardly straightforward about interest level when it was brought up but was not the type to forwardly propel the relationship progress. In a way, just kind of 'there' (not a bad thing at all)
Thank you - this is all very helpful. I think I am just in this awkward phase between a (very promising) first date and the agreement on a second date. He did on a few occasions during the first date hint at doing stuff together ("I have never been fishing" - "Oh, we need to change that"), so I think he is as interested as I am, but he does not communicate as much as I would like (but always responds to my texts). I don't mind initiating the contact at all, but I can get so over-excited and don't want to be a pest.
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
Speaking from personal experience here, but my SLI made it clear about his intentions through regular daily phone calls. A week after we started dating, he then told me that he took his match.com profile offline, hinting at exclusivity. I told him that I would do the same. He mostly hinted at first, but I was able to decipher well enough judging from his actions and consistency. He would even write emails and say things such as, "I really *like* you", well before we ever uttered the L-O-V-E word to one another.
And as far as generic dating / love advice goes, I always tell my friends this: with the right one, neither of you will play games.
Have fun
And if God cares so wonderfully for flowers that are here today and gone tomorrow, won't he more surely care for you?- Matthew 6:30
He should call you and ask you out to do things with him regularly
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Do you mean that is what he should do as the man following a date or it is what an SLI would do?
Tbh, I am not into this gendered dating thing. I actually really appreciated, for example, that he let me pay for dinner. He drove over three hours roundtrip to meet me, so I told him that I want to pay for dinner a) because he made the effort to drive out and b) because I wanted to be able to comfortably order everything I want without having to worry about how much it will cost him. It was a great dinner because I turned it into the ultimate seafood feast and he went right along.
So yeah, I am not worried about who contacts whom first. But I already couldn't hide how absolutely mesmerized I was by him during the date, so I don't want to come across like a clingy stalker.
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
I didn't think about type during the date, but in retrospect it's so endearing how much I learned about distilling whiskey and fly fishing...I never thought either topic could be so entirely mesmerizing...
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
Get physical. lol. man are simple, SLI or not. most of the time.
Over it (but thanks all).
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
This is not what my early experience dating my husband was like all, fwiw.
My dh and I went on a date (I initiated contact w him, and after a bit of conversation/exchanged emails [this was on a dating site] he asked me out)... he texted that night to say he had a good time and to ask me out again... we went out a week later (I was very busy at the time, and I was also wary of seeming too interested)... we went out a second time... on and on. But I didn't "get in his face" at all, and if I had I wonder if I would have emasculated him. When I asked him he said he wouldn't have minded, but it wouldn't have been my way (as a result of learning the hard way to let the guy chase). YMMV, but that's my experience.
"In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is." - Yogi Berra
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
here's something that you will enjoy reading...brought to you by R*euben
http://www.thebolde.com/future-husba...8-differences/
You’re seeing this guy. And you can’t tell if he’s the one or just a waste of your time, aka an asshole. We’re here to help:
1. Your future husband brings out the best in you. An asshole brings out the crazy, stalker bitch in you.
2. Your future husband values commitment and partnership. An asshole is just trying to hang out.
3. Your future husband sees your success as his success. An asshole needs to take you down a notch.
4. Your future husband thinks you’re the most beautiful woman in the world. An asshole’s eyes keep wandering.
5. Your future husband makes you feel secure. An asshole makes you want to check his phone.
6. Your future husband prioritizes your happiness. An asshole prioritizes his own happiness.
7. Your future husband enjoys conversation with you. An asshole just wants you to be quiet.
8. Your future husband makes plans with you in advance. An asshole always pops up out of nowhere the same day.
9. Your future husband creates a feeling of forward momentum in the relationship. An asshole wants to keep things exactly as they are.
10. Your future husband makes it clear he’s into you. An asshole keeps you wondering.
11. Your future husband makes you feel chased. An asshole is someone you’re always struggling to pin down.
12. Your future husband consistently reaches out to you. An asshole goes radio silent for days.
13. Your future husband texts you just to check in. An asshole texts you when he wants something.
14. Your future husband asks about you and your life. An asshole couldn’t care less.
15. Your future husband is great in real life. An asshole looks good only on paper, if that.
16. Your future husband treats you like a priority. An asshole makes you feel like a backup plan.
17. Your future husband does nice little things for you, just because. An asshole doesn’t.
18. Your future husband wants to show you off to his friends and family. An asshole hides you from them.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Well that is the confusing part. He was very engaged, looked me in the eyes when we talked, asked me questions, engaged with my answers, was interested in my life, took in my surroundings, indicated that we will do things together in the future, was courteous, sweet, and affectionate. Expressed that he likes me.
And then barely a text. I find that disrespectful. Either you ARE interested as you say, in which case you can spare a minute for a text. Or you are not interested, in which case a) you don't act like you are and b) tell me (especially when I ask you to do that).
I haven't closed the chapter yet because I do realize people have lives and quirks, but I am less than impressed and at times I get so frustrated because with each jerk (not yet saying he is one, but there have been plenty) I meet and date, I get more suspicious with the next one and it's not fair to the good guys out there. I also don't like being suspicious and negative - that's not my nature.
/rant
I am actually not overly sad about it (just disappointed because it was so promising and I really enjoyed the date) because we have not been talking for that long and only met once, I am just ranting about people being confusing.
Thank heavens I am a 7....
Last edited by Kim; 09-25-2016 at 03:39 PM.
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
I could see an SLI feeling that things were clearly laid out during the date and need no further affirmation and getting wrapped up in work and the immediacy of daily life and stress and what have you. Attentive when you are in his physical space, withdrawn when you are not. That being said, my SLI ex was the opposite, very attentive, but his love language was time spending.
It doesn't matter. I don't like it and that's that. I like his reaction to my inquiries even less. Don't like to be patronized.
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
"Well alright then you dont like texts so why don't we spend more actuall time together?"
Is how I would feel and probably say.
Sucks a lot. Of all the men I have met since my break-up with the long-term relationship, he seemed to be someone who worked on all levels (personality, attraction, chemistry, values, career compatibility, ease of conversation, mutual interests, flexibility, etc. it seemed to all be there). In my particular life and career situation, that's very hard to find. Ironically, part of the reason I liked him was because he seemed dependable and "noble" (for lack of a better word). He seemed solid. So this is really a bummer (especially since he was sweet and affectionate throughout and in his first texts the days after) :/
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
It's fine. Live and learn. I would rather put myself out there and be disappointed than staying at home moping about being single. I am getting exceptionally good at the dusting off thing.
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
I feel like SLI men are 1 - men and 2 - sensing types so, introverts or not, they are the ones best left as the main pursuer, at least for a real relationship as opposed to just hooking up. I dated three SLI guys whose types I'm sure of: the first (before I knew socionics) pursued me and things worked well until we broke up due to ntr issues; the second (after I knew socionics) was pursued by me, and things did not work out at all; the third (after I knew socionics and also after I had learned what I interpreted as a valuable lesson in letting the guy lead) pursued me and we ended up getting married.
One thing I have observed about SLI guys, including my husband, is that they tend to take for granted what they have sometimes, especially when it comes right to them...which imo is part of why it's better not to chase them but to let them pursue in the beginning, while you just be your lovely, bubbly, interesting and interested IEE self. That way you get to observe and find out if they're really interested, and they get to learn from experience that they want to be w you.
The guy you describe, @Kim, does sound flaky. It's his loss if he doesn't come around, imo...like I said, on to the next + enjoying your own life in the meantime. (...as cheesy as that may sound )
*waiting for someone to say I'm a mistyped victim type married to a mistyped aggressor after this post *
"In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is." - Yogi Berra
I just really can't play along with the pursuer thing. I feel like I am excitable and I want to express excitement, so for me to step back and act like he needs to chase me feels like a performance. If he does not want to be with me because I am "too easily available," then he is probably not for me anyway. It just would feel inauthentic and forced to me.
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin