No worries Scapegrace, I see we're very different. Speaking of different, I can already tell some members around here are a bit ...special
No worries Scapegrace, I see we're very different. Speaking of different, I can already tell some members around here are a bit ...special
Stop attaching content thatīs not there to my words. Obviously she was coming from a very subjective perspective with what she initially said, Iīm sure it was pretty clear to everyone, common knowledge, you didnīt enlighten anyone. The only thing thatīs not useless in this discussion is your question whether one finds their Conflictor boring. So to answer from my experience : as kkmr said, itīs at first tense and exciting , then disappointing and requiring distance because of deeply rooted misunderstandings and conflict.
Last edited by Amber; 01-14-2014 at 11:05 AM.
So far you donīt seem Constructivist to me. So iīm sticking to IEI. They can be accurate, but I don't use them as the most important tool. Some are harder to spot only from a discussion , cause people often don't know themselves too well, and you have to see them in action for a longer while (eg. process-result).
@darya it's impossible to type someone based on a forum thread with Reinin Dichotomies.
I recommend you to become familiar with Model A when you're more familiar with Socionics you can use Reinin Dichotomies trying to self-type.
When I started with socionics I also picked up Reinin Dichotomies early because I thought it's a easy and accurate way for self-typing. Well it isn't at all.
A mentally challenged ILE? That would be like finding Bigfoot
"Special" as in cuckoo. But who am I to judge hehe..
My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical. C.G. Jung
Reinin is one of the more difficult topics in socionics, because many of the dichotomies are deduced and only aligned with the most limited of observations. Also many Reinin are the undercurrents which affect compatibility and not surface level interactions which are more readily apparent. A good example is merry/serious and judicious/decisive, these are two key compatibility characteristics yet within each quadra there are 4 types, 2 clubs and 4 temperaments and many differences between these individuals.
My favorite part of Reinin dichotomies is when Maritsa acts like "serious" means that people don't have a sense of humor.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
You seek a great fortune, you three who are now in chains. You will find a fortune, though it will not be the one you seek.
But first you must travel a long and difficult road, a road fraught with peril.
You shall see things, wonderful to tell. You shall see a... cow... on the roof of a cotton house. And, oh, so many startlements.
I cannot tell you how long this road shall be, but fear not the ob-stacles in your path, for fate has vouchsafed your reward.
Though the road may wind, yea, your hearts grow weary, still shall ye follow them, even unto your salvation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pukq_XJmM-k
You sound nuts. Therefore IEI>EII.
Sincerely Yours,
Beyond the clouds. Beyond the sun.
The Rebel without a cause.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
And you are some kind of authority on sense of humour ?