it's nice to see someone who is so aware of his primate roots
it's a combination of objectivist creative logic that frames ILI's opinions as objective statements (e.g. "your group is having personal time management issues" instead of "I believe/think/imo your group is having personal time management issues") and primarily declaring style of communication (ILIs are
declaring by Reinin dichotomies)
it also depends on who is on the receiving end - ILI duals don't mind their their criticism and instructions (that other types may interpret as arrogance and take offense)
"In fact, ILI is constantly provoking the initiative of his dual, making him chase himself, exhausting him in tactical games, cooling down his passions, extinguishing his fierceness, knocking down his ambitions, taking away some of the "harmful", "destructive" energy of his dual. Once ILI manages to "calm down" and "humble" his dual, he builds a relationship with him as an equal. He can take on a generously patronizing tone that, most interestingly, the SEE will hold up and support." (
link)
"ILI will be confounded by the frivolity and flippancy of his partner, his unscrupulousness, absence of self-criticism, and a fundamental unwillingness to admit mistakes. In these traits IEE is very much unlike ILI's dual, the SEE, who will carry out his assignments at whatever cost if has pledged to it, and who will listen to and accept the criticism of his mistakes rather than ignore it, especially if this criticism is fair and constructive." (
link)
once again it depends on the listener - those who aren't appreciative of LII negativist Ti are more likely to feel annoyed and angered in conversation with them, while other types may react more favorably
for the most part LII are perceived in this light less frequently - they are asking types (and not declaring as ILIs), with subjectivist logic which frames their thoughts as personal opinions and a 'softer' intuitive function in creative position, in combination with normative ethical function that adjusts their behavior to acceptable standards
neither do SLIs as asking positivist types ... however SLIs display greater degree of confidence and no-bullshit groundedness in their opinions than ILIs (Si as base function enables them to hone into the actual rather than figurative interpretations of Ni bases) and on this basis they may claim the upper hand in debates with ILIs
perhaps, there is very little info to go by here