human flesh tastes like pork
@Vizany has an edgy rightwing Twitter account somewhere
@Vizany
"Males were convicted of the vast majority of homicides in the United States, representing 89.5% of the total number of offenders."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_crime
Edgy is a bit of a stretch, but yes, yes I do.Originally Posted by mfckrz
human flesh tastes like pork
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
human flesh tastes like pork
human flesh tastes like pork
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
Almost every single one of those points was officially promoted in the USSR and in today's China. The only possible exception is "disdain for modernism" because of the embrace of technological progress.
true, I think the image is supposed to contrast left-wing liberalism more, but in that regard, more "classical" Communism definitely fits those points as well.
human flesh tastes like pork
human flesh tastes like pork
human flesh tastes like pork
ipsa scientia potestas est-adaequatio intellectus et rei
ipsa scientia potestas est-adaequatio intellectus et rei
A racist's guide to online political discussion: pretend to be a Conservative.
lol nice affirmation of my photo.
isn't free speech a great thing.
ipsa scientia potestas est-adaequatio intellectus et rei
Free speech is a wonderful thing. Yet another racist's guide to online political discussion: everyone who criticizes me is trying to censor my speech.
who said anything about me being censored?
the free speech reference was a reminder that i can say what i please, when i please. now, take your passive-aggressive offended baby-rage elsewhere.
ipsa scientia potestas est-adaequatio intellectus et rei
And I can say what I please, which is that you have the world view of a histrionic little child who can't see the nuances in the other side's arguments.
yeah of course you can. just don't quote me is what i was telling you but you somehow failed to understand me. whatever, you're a waste of my time. bye.
ipsa scientia potestas est-adaequatio intellectus et rei
~bye~
yey free speech professors lol
The "racist" label is a metric institutions use to dictate who they will throw their institutional weight out to materially marginalize.
If an idea were factually solid and consistent, but it still fit the prescription of "racist," that fact alone could, and in the past has, been used to socially invalidate it. Also, it's not just grassroots censuring of ideas labeled racist either. Platforms of public discourse, which often retain monopoly in their niche because of networking effects, liberally use the "racist" charge to choke certain subjects from public discussion. Applying a label to an idea is NOT criticism, it is an ad-hominem. An ad-hominem that, in this case, is not grassroots, but bears an asymmetrical, institutional stigma.
Also, when someone starts throwing out innocuous-looking conservative ideas, the same types who slander with the "racist" label turn around and accuse these perfectly innocuous ideas of being """"dogwhistles,"""" assume they are always coded language with no benefit of the doubt extended, refusing to engage the implications of these proposals on their own terms or merit.
So whether or not you're "lawful" in handling some right-leaning ideas, it's damned if you do or don't.
You've totally boxed up the conversation so the only conclusions it can yield are done on YOUR terms.
And no, you don't get to use the "Well, if you're not a wayciss, why are you so afraid of being called one, HUUUUUUHHHH?!" counterargument. You can say the same thing about calling someone a pedophile or a rapist, but people can still get falsely accused of being them, and the implications of that charge are rightful grounds for anger by the accused.
Last edited by Grendel; 07-24-2019 at 03:48 AM.
I agree with you that this exists on the Left to some extent; I advance that this is rather due to the inherent tribalism of political discourse, meaning that something similar exists on the Right -- by the conflation of Liberalism with ANTIFA for instance. I assure you that I can tell the difference between Conservatism and Reactionary racism.
Conservatives, especially the Burkean kind, hold a well-articulated, sophisticated ideology that doesn't have the reflexive prejudice and overwrought simplicity of moral outlook inherent to racists and reactionaries.
oh yeah, the racist card is such a marginalizing tool that go guess, Trump won the elections...
The Cartoonist was fired
2nd largest nationalities living in each country of Europe:
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
human flesh tastes like pork
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
