I am partial to name brands.
I am partial to name brands.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I also live in Germany, but Germany is very Delta-value (ESTj, ISTp) and also somehow Alpha-value (ESFj, ISFp) heavy in my opinion! Intensity and crassness is not appreciated here. Normality, stability and so on are very common. I noticed how most people are Delta and Alpha here, at least how I experienced it. Like most people have this very practical Jack Wolfskin and crocs sense of fashion (lol), are very laid back and like to live this safe, stable and harmonious life style. Many people are very prude and prefer traditional beauties. But yes soft features in females are valued here, though I noticed this is the case in most cultures, not necessarily only here (?).
Guys I find attractive:
1020.jpg
IMG_1241_Fotor.jpg
2030dfb8f414301d31c22b410aeb6df4.jpg
Ethnicity doesn't really matter to me, if someone is attractive then they are no matter their skin/hair/eye colour. To me it's mostly about sharp and manly looks (I kinda like the bad boy vibe with tattoos) and a not too skinny built with broad shoulders and a good back.
Women I find attractice (yes I added girls too, because why not haha):
Emily_48_cpbhbz.jpg
ChlXeQyXEAAtgNq.jpg
large.jpg
86a48410aec94e5728f49f74f7683d62.png
Apparently when I removed a picture I didn't like it appeared as an attached thumbnail at the bottom of the post.. anyone knows how to properly remove it? It's kinda annoying. :<
Last edited by dot; 02-16-2017 at 09:39 AM.
@MaviTilki I think Germany is Delta (prob ESTj)... why do people think that it's Beta?
.
Last edited by dot; 02-17-2020 at 12:48 PM.
I've made the same observations.
Ironically, I am also from Germany and my parents are ESTj and ESFj (both Si subtype).
They are pretty much embodying the stereotypes.
Most people seem to be Caretakers and Childlike here, apart from (male) LSIs who are fairly common too, followed by ESIs.
Both SEEs and SLEs aren't common, and Victims are rare.
Victims !
.
Last edited by dot; 02-17-2020 at 12:49 PM.
Everyone mother is ESFJ !
Oh you picture remind me something.... I should have added Dr Cameron from Dr House in my tastes, was big fan of her lol.
Last edited by noaydi; 02-17-2017 at 06:32 AM.
Am I alone to not be into "perfect" girl like model and stuff (my previous image wasn't representative lol just outa fun) ? I see everyone posting top model, Ive never been really attracted to model and stuff.... I'm looking currently "what to post" in this post searching for "female model" in google, I would probably have an easier time finding something to post if I searched in a random dating website...
@Cassandra stop posting or you will turn me homosexual lol
generally I can't say if a man is hot or not, but Ive to admit your models are stylish
Haha!!
Thank you. xD
Guys can be stylish and hot, too.
P.S: Yesterday I have come across this and this, and for hours I've just been browsing the archives looking for pics of guys I find attractive... xD
P.P.S: I'm pretty sure the vast majority of those model guys are gay, so... I don't necessarily expect a straight guy to exactly look like one of them.
Don't just look at pics of attractive guys... go and meet attractive guys.
Harry Styles is my baby boy.
Any typological comments?
I think it's safe to say that I feel like fringes look cool.
@Theoria 100% Se/Ni-Valuing, the first two pics point to ILI imo.
@Theoria Those look like either ILIs or SLEs.
Hard to say, I'm merely average-looking personally, my mother though she was a sight to behold when young
@Resonare is correct about those pics indicating Se/Ni-valuing. I'm also attracted to those women. Heck, some of those pics look like women I've dated. But I would suggest that you are attracted to them for reasons other than your socionics type. Perhaps they resemble someone you fixated on in your childhood, sort of like an Imago.
Imagos can really mislead you. Mine happens to be a tall, thin, redheaded intuitive introvert with a long face, lots of Fe and an independent spirit and a predeliction for modern furniture and abstract art. It so happens that some IEI's fit that description, but that doesn't make me an SLE.
The reason I say this is because your avatar, your speech, the fact that you prefer animated movies about giant Pandas (caregivers) over Ridley Scott movies like Blade Runner (Aggressors), all point toward your being LII over ILI.
However, I don't want to battle-type, because I could be completely wrong, and usually am. You know yourself best. Instead, one way to help narrow down your type is for you to decide which kind of female you would prefer. Caregiver, Aggressor, Infantile, or Victim? Not from pictures alone, but from the way you want to be treated.
Why? I'm genuinely curious about this.
Debatable, but I'm not genuinely curious about that .your speech
(for the interested, here's the post in reference: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...=1#post1171069 )the fact that you prefer animated movies about giant Pandas (caregivers) over Ridley Scott movies like Blade Runner (Aggressors)
But you made that fact up . I only said that I was watching the panda movie, not that I was liking it. And the rest of my comment implied that I have watched Blade Runner (which means that I must've been watching it, at some points in time). So, really, there is only evidence that the panda movie and Blade Runner, for me, are in fact in the same category (of having been being watched). And there is no evidence for any category they might differ in -- I said I didn't like Blade Runner, yes, but I didn't say I like Panda Kopanda.
Also, lol -- your language more often than not seems full of deliberate humour to me.
Blade Runner (Aggressors)Are you serious about these associations?giant Pandas (caregivers)
I'd appreciate if you partook further.However, I don't want to battle-type
Seriously, this is fun, for now.
Aw, I love recognitions of difficulties of knowldege .because I could be completely wrong, and usually am. You know yourself best.
That's probably much harder for me to consider than anything else in this discussion. Sorry...which kind of female you would prefer. Caregiver, Aggressor, Infantile, or Victim? Not from pictures alone, but from the way you want to be treated.
Your avatar consists of what appears to me to be a stylized Greek letter (I’m not Ti enough to figure out which one, if any) which interposes, like a guarding barrier fence, between you (the viewer) and a bunch of shadowy, anonymous people milling about on the other side of the protection of the Gate of Science and Reason. If that is not the world-view of every LII that I’ve ever known, then I don’t know what is. – You asked.
See the next section of your note.
Focusing on the minute details of exactly what was said and not said, implied and not implied, evidence and not-evidence, is a complete exposition of dominant Ti. Faced with the same situation, the ILI CapitalistPig would have summarized his views with a simple and very Te response of “Fuck off”. Your response was completely different.
It’s dat Ti-dom-Te-dom attraction that you are feeling, as Beebe predicted. Just because we Extinguish each other’s ventures does not mean we can’t appreciate the other’s viewpoints.
You mean my associating a Panda with caregiving and comfort and Pris with Aggressive sexuality? Yep. As a Victim, I could watch a Panda movie for about three minutes, tops, but I could watch Pris’ thigh gap for hours. Maybe she and I could do some acrobatics, too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9t5ikxjAQ4
Just ask yourself if you’d rather have a nice, respectable woman bring you a warm cup of tea and a blanket while she protects you from the hustle and bustle of the outside world, maybe open her blouse for you while tucking you in at night and asking if she can do anything else for you, or would you rather have a sexually aggressive woman show up at your door, barge in, dominate you, ravage both you and your house, then leave?
Disclaimer – people and situations may have been exaggerated for clarity.
This is actually pretty interesting, because, that's not even close to my interpretation of it, apart from the identification of the Greek letter reference. Now, tell me -- does your interpretation not say more about you, than me?
It is only fitting that I respond with a succinct meme sentence, then: "Theoria is my praxis."*Focusing on the minute details of exactly what was said and not said, implied and not implied, evidence and not-evidence, is a complete exposition of dominant Ti. Faced with the same situation, the ILI CapitalistPig would have summarized his views with a simple and very Te response of “Fuck off”. Your response was completely different.
(.............in typological terms: Te could be mistaken for Ti when a person is so dominantly characterized by E5, unlike someone like CPig where that might not be an issue)
Also -- do you think End is LII too? If not, how is his language more Te than mine?
Who's Beebe?as Beebe predicted
Certainly.Just because we Extinguish each other’s ventures does not mean we can’t appreciate the other’s viewpoints.
Well, you didn't say Pris -- in which case I find that equation ridiculous anyway -- there's an immense disparity of sexual intensity between the scenes that feature Pris and those that don't. I enjoyed the scenes with Pris more than almost every other scene, but they don't take up much of the movie, do they?You mean my associating a Panda with caregiving and comfort and Pris with Aggressive sexuality?
That just sounds like, again, more of a "fixation" issue, than a functional, information-metabolical difference. In other words, E5 vs not-E5: “An intellectual is a person who has discovered something more interesting than sex.”but I could watch Pris’ thigh gap for hours
Again -- sorry. Still as difficult to ascertain as before . They sound appealing and bothersome in their own ways.Just ask yourself if you’d rather have a nice, respectable woman bring you a warm cup of tea and a blanket while she protects you from the hustle and bustle of the outside world, maybe open her blouse for you while tucking you in at night and asking if she can do anything else for you, or would you rather have a sexually aggressive woman show up at your door, barge in, dominate you, ravage both you and your house, then leave?
*"Theory is my praxis" is a meme sentence culminated by a Facebook meme page: https://www.facebook.com/theoryismypraxis/
I adapted it to "Theoria is my praxis", of course, for additional relevance, and to separate it further from its original context of revolutionary inaction.
Last edited by Theoria; 02-19-2017 at 03:40 AM.
@Theoria
Those women mostly seem to be ESI to me, with a significant Type 4 fix...
I don't "see" any Intuition lead. Intuition lead people tend to have an "unfocused" gaze, whereas people with good tend to have a very focused, almost fixating or piercing gaze.
Apart from that, there are other little clues that make me think ESI... But it's mostly based on intuitive hunches, especially because these are only pictures.
Though I remember that one woman from the French movie "Masculin Feminin", and she seemed to be ESI...
P.S: As Adam pointed out, being attracted to a certain sociotype doesn't mean you are either their Dual or Semi-Dual, whatever.
It says more about your Imago than your real type.
P.P.S: The first woman actually reminds me of some EIIs, but not sure.
As I said, attraction preferences can be unrelated to your own type – it says more about which types you are into based on some "early imprinting".
You could very well be an LII with a thing for ESI women. Super-Ego attraction isn't the rarest (that would be Conflictor attraction ).
can't remember if i posted a pic of him before, but I lust after oded fehr pretty hardcore. Too bad he's straight and married.
Alright, so I am just compiling pics of several guys in one post, so I don't spam you all too much.
It's cool to see how obvious my (physical) Imago is, after picking all those dudes.
Note: Those guys are models I've found on tumblr sites.
I haven't been "following" the models, just looked up sites with attractive guys on them, and picked out those that caught my eye.
For those of you who'd like to look up more pics of them, I've added their names.
I've also added their ethnicity if it was mentioned, because I find it interesting how people's ethnicities correlate with their looks,
and which ethnicities I consequently tend to be attracted to more often.
They are all gorgeous!! I realized I really prefer to see guys smiling and with an energetic vibe around them though. So something was 'off' about these dudes to me - but I think it isn't the dudes' fault, it's the fact that they are modeling photos. Guys are so much more attractive in their natural facial expressions.
You guys really know what you want. I'm ahhh...I just want a dual who loves me and who isn't afraid of commitment. lol
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html