I_Fp?
Scarlett Johansson
I_Fp?
Last edited by silke; 07-08-2017 at 09:12 AM. Reason: updated links
me
Has a bit of the ISFP-ish look again.
here she looks ISFp
she also looks a bit like alyssa milano and a teensy bit like hilary duff though
Shes yummy.. She seems innocent and naughty at the same time
ENFp (Unsure of Subtype)
"And the day came when the risk it took to remain closed in a bud became more painful than the risk it took to blossom." - Anaïs Nin
Yeah, that's ISFp.Originally Posted by meatburger
me
I thought the 3rd photo of her reminded me of the isfp pic under the VI game in socionics.com.....
wow you went SEI? there was another thread in here i think she was typed INTp.
I believe she is p and a T because her "feminine" qualities like style of dress don't seem to be natural for her but an afterthought (i hope the T females relate, i do myself)
a good word for SEI is simplicity, not sure if that is innocence or not. scarlett seems quite aware/mature and appears that way too; i find SEIs have a disconnect between the two-- that's what makes them "cute" and such.
Not ISFP, perhaps ESTP?
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
Whatever she is, she is my favorite current mainstream actressMy inner-pervert is showing
Currently she's in my favourite female actresses top list:Whatever she is, she is my favorite current mainstream actress
Angelina Jolie
Scarlett Johansson
Charlize Theron
Kate Beckinsale
me
SEE
ISFp imo.
How did you derive SEE?
Well, I watched several video interviews:How did you derive SEE?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jp1--...elated&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8I6El...elated&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGUKJw0Rens
I think she is base. Part of it is the assertive, masculine voice and bits of forcefulness when she's being funny. Part is the heavy facial features and impulsive body movements. In the last video she reminds me of Britney Spears. Also, she's not very expressive in the way she talks (
), but mostly just smiles, chuckles, and says nice words here and there.
http://www.socionika.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=201
not a bad topic on her. i'm surprised at the discrepancy of opinions here.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Those folks favor the "crystal ball" VI approach, rather than simply studying people directly. I think we are more advanced here then they are, actually.
i tend to agree that they do a sort of "crystal ball" approach and v.i. is hardly an exact science (btw, i do like that you reference videos for this.) i just find it sort of intriguing that one board would say ENTj/INTp while another board may say ISFp. i could easily buy her as ESFp. i don't see muchThose folks favor the "crystal ball" VI approach, rather than simply studying people directly. I think we are more advanced here then they are, actually.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
I agree with Rick's typing.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
That thread was funny. They were looking only at intuitive types (bizarre, huh??), and Lytov pops in and says that she is known in Hollywood for being sexually uninhibited, and they argued back, "you mean ILIs and LIEs can't be uninhibited??"i tend to agree that they do a sort of "crystal ball" approach and v.i. is hardly an exact science (btw, i do like that you reference videos for this.) i just find it sort of intriguing that one board would say ENTj/INTp while another board may say ISFp. i could easily buy her as ESFp. i don't see muchThose folks favor the "crystal ball" VI approach, rather than simply studying people directly. I think we are more advanced here then they are, actually.
Here's a somewhat more respectable forum (in Russian) where she is typed primarily as SEE, with a few saying SEI and one dude from the Vilnius school popping in with LIE again. Lytov seems undecided as to SEE vs. IEE.
http://www.socioforum.ru/topic554.html
So I think the Vilnius boys are smoking something.
That thread was funny. They were looking only at intuitive types (bizarre, huh??), and Lytov pops in and says that she is known in Hollywood for being sexually uninhibited, and they argued back, "you mean ILIs and LIEs can't be uninhibited??"i tend to agree that they do a sort of "crystal ball" approach and v.i. is hardly an exact science (btw, i do like that you reference videos for this.) i just find it sort of intriguing that one board would say ENTj/INTp while another board may say ISFp. i could easily buy her as ESFp. i don't see muchThose folks favor the "crystal ball" VI approach, rather than simply studying people directly. I think we are more advanced here then they are, actually.
Here's a somewhat more respectable forum (in Russian) where she is typed primarily as SEE, with a few saying SEI and one dude from the Vilnius school popping in with LIE again. Lytov seems undecided as to SEE vs. IEE.
http://www.socioforum.ru/topic554.html
So I think the Vilnius boys are smoking something.
i think she'd be ethical sub SEE. she's relaxed yet sort of aggressive, too. she has the sort of
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Yeah I guess that makes sense.Well, I watched several video interviews:How did you derive SEE?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jp1--...elated&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8I6El...elated&search=
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGUKJw0Rens
I think she is base
I 'd like to jump her bones.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
I would say SEE
Gosh I wish I looked like her
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
ESFp has always worked for me.
i forget socionics, but i say more SEI.
whenever the dog and i see each other we both stop where we are. we regard each other with a mixture of sadness and suspicion and then we feign indifference.
Jerry, The Zoo Story by Edward Albee
The one I'd want to love, fuck, marry, have kids with and live a happy life together, forever.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
I thought Parker would love this thread lol
I've heard Ni-ENFj, and I see no real reason to think otherwise.
Beta, most likely Ni-ENFj.
Her character in Iron Man 2 was kind of ungodly hot.
Fixed
I'll fix your face.
But seriously, I normally only think her roles are ok, but yeah, I mean, she's hot in general. That role I actually liked.
I liked her role too, she was a welcome respite from Robert Downey Jr. being a general dick lol.I'll fix your face.
But seriously, I normally only think her roles are ok, but yeah, I mean, she's hot in general. That role I actually liked.
Me and shindaiwa kinda agree that Ni-ENFjs are pretty hot in general
so overrated. plastic surgery and still theres a plethora of other hot girls out there. The chick in watchmen for her acting and sexuality >>>>
I would've thought she'd be an Ni type.
ISFP
For some reason she always seems like she's on the verge of becoming fat.
lmao, it's the cheekbones.
Probably EIE.
I think SEI.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
