Last edited by Korpsy Knievel; 10-11-2011 at 05:46 PM.
Something about that video was terrifying.
Like a true ESE, always dramatically maintaining their body.
Are you sure that's not Hitta? I'll have to watch it when I get on a good connection. I can't get it to work where I am right now.
LII-Ti
The small number of responses in this thread suggests that visual identification is ineffective when the subject doesn't verbalize self disclosures. Thus VI shall henceforth be dubbed Talking-About-Myself Identification, or TAMI.
I still think you're XLI. It's all very fascinating how this hasn't changed. I feel that even XLIs can shave themselves in dim lighting. If I had a beard I think I might be inclined to shave it. I might fear baldness because the sun would burn me to death. I feel bald heads make one naked to the sun... they invite the rays to bore into one's mind.
I'm curious where you're getting the possibility of Ne-Si valuing since I tend to detest those IEs and have a history of touchy or poor relations with IEEs and LSEs, not to mention alphas in general.
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...118#post775118
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...830#post775830
Note the non-clipping hand making tactile inspection of the hair and scalp. That's the mark of a no-look buzz.I feel that even XLIs can shave themselves in dim lighting.
Since I'm a Norse American who grew up on a Norwegian granny's lefse and lutefisk feel free to regard my beard as a sign of k0rpsey the Viking.If I had a beard I think I might be inclined to shave it.
I tan nicely and don't often burn. A cropped head is easy to clean and maintain and doesn't provide assailants with an easily exploitable handhold like a full mop can.I might fear baldness because the sun would burn me to death.
Take a moment to visit google or wikipedia and research "hats".I feel bald heads make one naked to the sun... they invite the rays to bore into one's mind.
Last edited by Korpsy Knievel; 09-22-2011 at 09:58 PM.
You have the Ashton "D'oh, who me?" look; your gaze seems similar.
Other than rubbing a pair of tits across the back of my neck and head in the process, there's nothing a stylist is going to accomplish with my hair that I can't do myself.
Seriously, I think you widely misinterpreted my post. For one, I didn't think that people can get much from you posting a video of yourself grooming (in dim lighting)... and so I suspected that the thread wasn't very serious and responded to it in kind (beyond this you never struck me as waffling on your type but as seeming at least fairly sure of your self-typing). For two, comments like "well, I don't get along with such and such type and that other such and such type, and so how can I be such and such type" arguments will mean absolutely nothing to someone who doesn't know you and the supposed such-and-such'es in your life that you're referring to (these arguments can't really be responded to--I mean what would I say? "Oh, well, in that case... obviously you're ILI... that was the missing piece of info I needed to solidify this in my mind!"). So I didn't care about your response because I don't want to get in a pointless type debate over such crap that I have no knowledge of anyway (I don't want to fight with you over your type especially when I barely said anything about it to begin with). I said that I could see Te and that's why I said XLI, not because I think SLI is a perfect option, but because I don't know very much about you (and so tentatively, I noticed Te, and that was it). Perhaps I should have refrained from commenting at all. This is seriously why I don't comment about people's types usually because so many "type me" threads are just "tell me I'm the type I think I am (or the one I want to be) or I'll get really offended and bitchy" threads. I had assumed (stupidly) that this wasn't one of them. You can rest assured that I'll make no further remarks regarding your type (which I now do not care about in the most absolute sense) in the future. Beyond this, if you interpreted it this way, I was not making fun of your beard, or of you in any way.
Let's find out.
My assumption is that the behavioral fruits of my prominently active IEs should be displayed through my actions. The video is meant for purposes of visual identification, not speech analysis identification.For one, I didn't think that people can get much from you posting a video of yourself grooming (in dim lighting)...
But but but but but but but socionics is the study of inter-relations! Surely there must be some value in the patterns I've described in my interactions, unless of course that information went unread.For two, comments like "well, I don't get along with such and such type and that other such and such type, and so how can I be such and such type" arguments will mean absolutely nothing to someone who doesn't know you and the supposed such-and-such'es in your life that you're referring to
You could say that but I'd find that line of reasoning odd and the tone of the response sarcastic.(these arguments can't really be responded to--I mean what would I say? "Oh, well, in that case... obviously you're ILI... that was the missing piece of info I needed to solidify this in my mind!").
I've been collecting types since taking up socionics, so far garnering SLI, SEE, LSI, IEI, ILI, IEE, SLE, ILE, and maybe a few others.So I didn't care about your response because I don't want to get in a pointless type debate over such crap that I have no knowledge of anyway (I don't want to fight with you over your type especially when I barely said anything about it to begin with). I said that I could see Te and that's why I said XLI, not because I think SLI is a perfect option, but because I don't know very much about you (and so tentatively, I noticed Te, and that was it).
Hmm, I thought I was having a bit of fun by poking fun at myself here and giving others the opportunity to do the same. Is the fact that you seem offended while I'm quite amused related to type and intertype? Nice new signature, btw.Perhaps I should have refrained from commenting at all. This is seriously why I don't comment about people's types usually because so many "type me" threads are just "tell me I'm the type I think I am (or the one I want to be) or I'll get really offended and bitchy" threads. I had assumed (stupidly) that this wasn't one of them. You can rest assured that I'll make no further remarks regarding your type (which I now do not care about in the most absolute sense) in the future. Beyond this, if you interpreted it this way, I was not making fun of your beard, or of you in any way.
How about shaving your private parts and posting a vid of it? I'm sure some on here would get a better view on what IMs you are wielding.
You certainly cut your hair like an ILI. Yep you are an ILI.
Hmm, I'm not sure how I could translate what I've seen into an IE expression... but you look rather serious doing it. But you don't seem to question your type in any way and I also don't see anything that contradicts ILI. On a related note, I have not much VI experience.
What are those tattoos on your right arm?
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
One says "That's life" in French and the other mentions thunder and lightning in German. Also on my person are the i-ching trigram Qián, and in Latin, "Irreplaceable time flies." The next additions will be the Hanged Man and Tower cards from the Waite-Rider tarot deck and images of Kali and Zurvan.
Nice. The solid, comfy, and genuine wealth of hearth and home. Interesting etymology,too. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/feoh
This video is bad for image typing anyway - to few nonverbal reactions, and video image is in low quality (low light, low resolution). Inteview, even without sound, is much better than this shit.
Talking-About-Myself seems like optimal, but is not neccesary - the man may tell about anything to give meaningful nonverbal information. Sometimes even talking is not needed, but the more info - the better.
I think, we should take all this for typing: 1) test (for preferences at least), 2) a form (with questions for 8 functions and 4 preferences, where a man may write a paragraph for each question), 3) video with a tale about something (themes: what I like/dislike; whate I do better than others/others do better than me; something other).
Anyway I doubt most here will identify types correctly having all this information. Low match is a scourge in typology so a typed person will be tangled anyway.
lol you did that
Korpsey looks like hitta in 6 years.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
btw the Hanged Man is my preferred significator. I think it's a very good card for the Dialectical-Algorithmic thought processes.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
We can only pray.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
Are you Ben Roethlisberger and Hitta's lovechild, korpsey?
I think the video is bad for the purposes of "visual identification." I can't really see much other than some guy shaving in dim lighting, as I said before. I really thought it was non-serious because of that.
I did actually read that thread when it first emerged and I've now read your posts again. I didn't really draw any conclusions from it. Although I think there are patterns to be sure about such things, I also think it's easy to see patterns everywhere and associate them with opposing IM preferences, and well, I just don't have much faith in this anymore (for one it's possible to have hideous relations with people in the same quadra with patterns of behavior that can be interpreted as revealing "IM differences"). I don't know for sure that I would see your ex-gf as an IEE if I knew her. I see a general dispute between logic and ethics. I don't understand why other types like SEE and ESE wouldn't possibly react similarly (although you said as much). I just don't (myself) draw any conclusions from those posts. I can't just read it and go "aha! he doesn't get along with IEEs! obviously SLI is out!" Anyway, I shouldn't really be commenting anyway because I don't have any helpful input regarding your type.But but but but but but but socionics is the study of inter-relations! Surely there must be some value in the patterns I've described in my interactions, unless of course that information went unread.
Well, my comment is sarcastic. Although I think I've failed to explain my point of view.You could say that but I'd find that line of reasoning odd and the tone of the response sarcastic.
noted.I've been collecting types since taking up socionics, so far garnering SLI, SEE, LSI, IEI, ILI, IEE, SLE, ILE, and maybe a few others.
I'm not offended anymore. I thought you were deliberately being a jerk, but now I don't think this is the case. However, I can add you to my list as O/N (among the great many): http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...&postcount=108Hmm, I thought I was having a bit of fun by poking fun at myself here and giving others the opportunity to do the same. Is the fact that you seem offended while I'm quite amused related to type and intertype?