oh how did you concluded that?
IMO she's an idealistic hippie. I used to be in doubt between INFp and ENFj. She once called herself 'an einzelganger in highschool'.
She has a highly evolved language (xNFx), everything she sais sounds like a poem. Next to that, she resembles an ex IEI girlfriend of mine perfectly.
I have a hardtime seeing an SEE in her I'm afraid... Except her eyebrows can be deceiving, similar to SEE.
Last edited by Jarno; 03-09-2010 at 12:35 PM.
seems more INFj then INFp
He has protruding supercilliary arches that you can see from this picture...
http://rickdelong.com/
This is also an ESTj on my dating site that's a replica genetic copy of Rick
http://www.plentyoffish.com/member10346440.htm
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 03-09-2010 at 08:22 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
the "idealistic hippie" is just a façade. This woman, like most people in Dutch politics, doesn't give a shit about the environment, she just got on that train because she wants power and influence. Don't let her words and political views fool you.
But apart from that, I simply don't see Fe in her behavior. She tries it at times, but her behavior is often so unauthentic, that she turns me off completely. I really don't hear poems when she speaks (and Sunday I saw Bright Star, a movie about Keats, now thát's true IEI poetry!), I only hear things she doesn't really mean.
Could it be that the fact you hear poems, mean she's your dual?
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Don't many people love different types of poetry?
I love poetry, I write them, but I don't like to share with anyone except for my a loved one, when I write them in a post card...or wisper the lines in their ear in bed. And, that is what's refered to as romantic. I live in a Victorian Romance in my mind and make up all sorts of dreamy things; so does INFp but they don't communicate like I do. My duals love poetry and confuse themselves for NF types but they are ESTj and what they really want is me
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
If you type everyone by their bones, clearly you'll have a high level of reliability.. the question is the validity.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
It's valid, because you can see from the dating site that I am on; I just pick all the morphologically typed ESTj's and put them in my favorites and all their profile writing match per type, just like I said before, every type has their language; language is the calling of a dual, it's a mating process...you know my dual says I am romanitic, meaning either they are seeking their dual or offering the right type of love.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
They are unfortunatly not fantasy but reality, because you can't see reality you are living in fantasy; learn to VI then you can tell the 16 people's apart from one another and learn about how each moves and talks and mates and communicates....that's our human reality.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I am sorry, you can't see or don't want to see...that's just not rational.
The heart without a dual is just a lonely hunter
My heart knows there to be a dual and I long
I long for that day
When I can say
That I have finally found love
The way I wished that it would be
The way I dream that it was
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I am INFp, not ISTj. What you see in my sig is not related to what we're talking about here. Anyway, you said you were sure I was either ISTp or ESFp. ISTj wasn't mentioned. But you aren't even in the ballpark. I am a stereotypical INFp.
Ok, so I typed you as either ISTp or ESFp....what are you disputing about? Which one you really are?; I would need to see more pictures.
Diane is ISTj...look at her postings and her writing and language and compare them to yours; does it match? Identical types have the same writing style...same words...same actions, same brain. Different childhood, different experiences, different interests, same conclusions.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Not at all, I'm the person who doesn't have to be right to have high self-esteem anyway.
You're bitter as hell because you think you are right and have not even begun to realize how much you are deluding yourself and that you are trying to escape that self-confrontation by focusing on other people instead of yourself and trying to convince them of your truths (ETA: which is a surrogate way of forcing other people to love you) . Which is why you haven't found a boy friend yet. Stop deluding yourself, and that mate you're looking for will knock at your door unexpectedly, without you putting any effort into it. Or to put it better: you will not find that love your looking for, because that's a perfectionistic, Romantic, immature, childish and egotistical kind of love, a love that will make everything all right. Instead you will find true love, which is in all respects the exact opposite of the kind of love you're looking for. But right now, you don't even know that such a thing exists.
Last edited by consentingadult; 03-10-2010 at 10:38 AM.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Kurt Cobain
Prince
Princess Diana
Adam Sandler
Tom Green
Please give me celebrities who you believe are IEI. I'm looking for living ones whom I'm likely to have heard of already. Post a pic or vid aswell! thx.
Here's a few from my list
Lesley Hornby / Twiggy: Ni-INFp
Janelle Monae: Fe-INFp
Jack White: Ni-INFp
i must say, i laughed extremely hard at the above comment
They all died.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly