Originally Posted by
Pinocchio
Subjective/objective information is related to Internal/External, as far as I know (Ni, Ne, Fi, Fe). Object/Field does not depend on the viewer (Si, Se, Ti, Te). And it's a fact that Ti types are the most driven by the imperativeness of the reality, it's the total opposite. Whether this reality is perceived correctly or not, this doesn't change things, in general Ti types tend to be wrong when they isolate information from the larger environment, not because of being subjective - this habit comes right from the necessity accuracy, as one can guess.
(this also answer thePirate's question of why two objective logical types may have divergent opinions, it all depends on the information one has at hand, not the way one processes information).
First of all, to clarify something: you're totally wrong in saying that Ti information is subjective information, this is the main point I'm trying to make, which extends to Objects/Fields. There's no such thing, Ti is defined as objective information in Socionics, so either there's a problem with your understanding in this case - which is my opinion at a glance - or with the Socionics definitions themselves.
---
One of my previous examples was the distance in space between two objects. "Distance" is field information and it's an objective one, it doesn't depend on the viewer's decision. The same are other properties on a single object, for example "position", which is the relation between the object and a reference point, the origin.
[for the sake of completeness, this type of information is Fields and Static, both "distance" and "position" properties of an object/pair of objects are Ti, while the "origin" (reference point) is Fi, Internal (subjective) chosen by the thinker]