Overlooked mistypings

[Gilly]

This is an internet forum. There is no policy for interaction and sharing of opinions. I agree that this makes clarity difficult in typing people correctly by comparing to other members of a supposed type, but Socionics is flimsy enough that trying to impose any kind of rules regarding the standardization of the typing process is foolish.

[Slacker]

I'm desperately ill today, and I should never have gotten started on these threads. I just did because I was annoyed by the suggestion that Pinocchio is all knowing and the whole forum should be changed to fit how he wants it.

The biggest weakness in Socionics is that there is no way to know for sure what type anyone is. That goes for every single person, including me, and both people arguing their types. There is no way to change that. To try to "authenticate" people would cause some people to be unquestioningly called the right type, and some people to be unquestioningly called the wrong type, and would be no improvement upon how things are now. And is pointless as we'd all argue about each other's type regardless.

[electric sheep]

wow I just realized the connection between this thread and Pinocchio's avatar.

Are you taking it upon yourself to hunt down and "correct" all the mistyped people that are "hiding" on this forum, Pinocchio? Because I don't know any of them, I swear!

[Logos]

Nerd wars. Holy shit. :jumps into black hawk and flies out of forum:

If there is a war, it is all in Pinocchio's mind.

Are you taking it upon yourself to hunt down and "correct" all the mistyped people that are "hiding" on this forum, Pinocchio? Because I don't know any of them, I swear!

One-man witch hunts and tribunals? I am sure that will turn out well.

[Gilly]

BananaPancakes could be IEE, but never ESI.