**removed**
**removed**
Last edited by duality is cringe; 10-18-2009 at 02:57 PM.
Quite a few of those don't look SLI to me.
I always typed Anna Paquin and Holly Marie Combs as SLI!
Cool, glad someone else saw it.
Te ISTp chicks are Hawt.
The end is nigh
This is
They are not all the same subtypes though. De Niro is Delta ST. Either LSE or SLI, I lean toward the latter though and don't see any "Se" in his yes. De Niro's type has been discussed here.
Last edited by duality is cringe; 06-21-2009 at 03:02 PM.
When it comes to VI, there is something I like to call "Deceptive Similarity." I was meaning to create a thread about this as well, but changed my mind. Take note of the following example.
Above are pictures of four different actresses. If you looked only at these pics (disregarding, or simply failing to take into account, body language in videos, temperments, intertype relations, and other important facets of socionics), a very obvious superficial similarity can be observed. Almost enough to claim them all as the same type. However, to the experienced VIer, these four ladies are actually three different types altogether.
VI is an artform or skill that takes time to become adept at. You have to know what to look for and what not to be thrown off by. I cannot claim this VI Guide, or any other for that matter, to be 100% fullproof. But it probably is virtually flawless.
Darling, I care for you so much. Why joke so morbidly?
only about half aren't SLIs... (only about half are LSIs)
so in other words, this is about the best anyone's ever done VIing them
Anyone want to go through them before I get back?
Clint Eastwood is LSI.
Yeah it took me a while to acknowledge that too...
I disagree with your statements JuJu, but sure. I would also like comparisons to people/types you think they more accuately resemble.
So...I thought Jude Law was ENFp?
I thought James Dean was a pretty good example of ISTp. What about Bruce Lee?
Hi! I'm an ENFP. :-)
Watch and observe Eastwood here.
Now compare his presence and overall bearing to Burt Reynolds (actual LSI) here.
Not only is there a huge behaviorial contrast, but Eastwood shares more facial similarities with other SLIs as well. Did you learning nothing from my well put together thread teaching the differences between leading- and leading-?
Last edited by duality is cringe; 04-21-2009 at 10:25 PM.
I need JuJu.
deante, I don't think anyone cares.
Does Sirena need JuJu to state her opinions for her? Will she admit that she knows virtually nothing about socionics/VI/information metabolism and could benefit from my teachings?
JuJu didn't do much to prove Ezra isn't LSE-Te, so I'll doubt he'll be able to do much here either. He's a good boy though. On that, we can all agree.
As a newfound general rule, I'm ignoring just about every useless post Cyclops decides to make from now on.
You could ask her.
You managed to prove it by seeing him as your mirror.JuJu didn't do much to prove Ezra isn't LSE-Te, so I'll doubt he'll be able to do much here either. He's a good boy though. On that, we can all agree.
Great, more Ti.As a newfound general rule, I'm ignoring just about every useless post Cyclops decides to make from now on.
Tell me that Carrie Ann Moss is not a blatant IP temperment and non -valuing? I'd be wiling to accept ILI, but nothing else. In fact, ILI might be better for her. That's my new typing. I'll remove her from the Guide. I'm adding Rhona Mitra in her place.
I will not be removing Anna Paquin. Prey tell what type you would suggest for Robert Sean Leonard?
Stop trying to start something.
Carrie Ann Moss is OBVIOUSLY Ni HA. Look at her go on about psychic moments and premonitions.
Pray tell why you will not be removing Anna Paquin without any justification.