Abu-Saddam Shishani - INTJ
Magika - ISFP
ASMR Cake Black - ISFP
ASyMR - ESFJ
Abu-Saddam Shishani - INTJ
Magika - ISFP
ASMR Cake Black - ISFP
ASyMR - ESFJ
Last edited by Sol; 07-07-2019 at 03:17 AM.
Steve Allen: ILE
LII Ne (++), or easily ILE
supa dupa <3
hmm, I'm thinking IEIOriginally Posted by WinnieW
I typed her SEI, because I see her valuingmore than
SEI? maybe IEI actually
Good question, I see elements of both. Would have to know more.
Cristallina83 - ISFP
Ariana grande SEI
Last edited by maniac; 07-20-2019 at 02:28 PM.
dunno if he was mentioned here before, but this guy is an ILE
https://youtu.be/xuCn8ux2gbs
he's an EIE, like Karl Marx btw.
ile
Plumbella - F. mb ISFJ
dude you're very off lately
Imogen Walters - ISFP
gal, to doubt in others' typings you'd need to be sure in own type, for the beginning
also SEI and ESI are not "very off"
I'm fairly certain of my own type
i typed her ILE and thats as far off from ESI you can come
she seems unusually intelligent for an F type, and she's not gentle like Fi dom -> especially this is from what you yourself sol has said
Sol thinks. from long ago. with good results
india m... feels. not so long. with bad results
who should be trusted? hard question
i like how you dodged everything i said
Courtney Marmo - ENTP
When your profile will keep the same type for long - then it can be said you probably sure in your type. In the past you changed the opinion about your type many times. Recently your profile had other type than now - some T.
I'm talking about the girl I posted. Well it's amusing and flattering that you're so preoccupied with my type
ILE
ILE? lol
I understand why people might find him annoying but I think he's really funny, as I do with all Alpha NTs, they're great
^He reminds me of Drew Monson (in his mannerisms)
I think they both are feelers though. They're whiny and emotional
ESE gives potty training to LII teddy bears
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
SteveTerreberry - N, mb ILE. glasses may add to T impression
mytoecold (Drew Monson) - I
I'm working on a gallery of socionics types since the beginning of this year. my goal is to have 50 examples for each type, but it can take quite a long time to type someone. I would like to ask my fellow alphas to go through the alpha gallery and write me if they notice someone that seems to be mistyped. I'm sure about 90% of my typings, but there's always a chance that I made a mistake.
http://soziotypen.de/die-16-soziotyp...ile-beispiele/
http://soziotypen.de/die-16-soziotyp...sei-beispiele/
http://soziotypen.de/die-16-soziotyp...ese-beispiele/
http://soziotypen.de/die-16-soziotyp...lii-beispiele/
Here's my feedback from all quadras:
I would have typed Tony Robbins D-EIE (not SEE)
John and Yoko are imo C-ILE & H-SEI (not EIE)
Margreth Thatcher seems D-LIE imo (not LSI)
Rich Piana: I thought he seemed ESE (not SLE), but who knows?
Carl Jung C-LII (not IEI)
I agree on von Karajan. He just seems LIE (Creative)
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
thanks! I want to post the other quadra types at a later time in their specific beta/gamma/delta boards. I think people have an easier time typing people who are similar to them, that's why I want to ask each quadra about their own types. I need to double check them first, though. there are still some examples that I'm doubtful of.
I've seen some interviews with Tony Robbins and he does not seem to have any intuition at all. often thinks that things will just stay the same (an example are his advises on investing, he recommends others to invest in something when it's going down because "it has always gone up again" in the past.
Yoko Ono is very concerned about future developments. wants to improve humanity and very often preaches love on her twitter account. I think she's an EIE and I agree with the harmonising subtype.
I've read about Rich Piano a long time ago when he died. he was a very aggressive person. his motto was "whatever it takes". took steroids and made very reckless decisions regarding to his health. pretty sure he's an SLE.
Carl Jung was a Ni dominant type. his book psychological types discusses many phenomens from the past. half of the book is not even about the types, but about history and esoteric concepts. his book "red book" is full of mystical and spiritual themes, with many drawings that just scream "Ni".
Yeah, I think ****** mustache is quite good fit on Tony Robbins.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Ok so about Jung. This is kindof a huge topic. The Red book is done under a deep life crisis under threat of psychosis. Any type can have hallucinations under extreme conditions. Just as any type dreams at night. Jung decided he needed to work on those visions in order to keep his head over the water, because he was in danger of losing his mind. Nowadays people go to a psychiatrist and say that they're having strange experiences and that they fear for their sanity, and then they get medication. To limit this to Ni is a mistake. Symbolism/art is a much broader psychological phenomenon.
Jung had a strong connection to the unconscious, but it is not type related.
Then there is also the topic about the nature of depth psychology. It is not Ni. It is an empirical study of the mind. When you analyze the mind you stumble on archetypes. And because archetypes has always been expressed in religion and mysticism there is a natural connection to these fields. You could say that depth psychology borrows esoteric concepts from mysticism because it is just a convenient way to label a specific psychological/archetypal phenomenon. The use of "esoteric concepts" gets misunderstood a lot. Jung himself adresses this on several occasions. For example, you could speak about "the unconscious" or you could say "the great Mother". The first expression sounds more technical and the second expression is more symbolical and thus says something about how we experience the unconscious and in that way says more, but they refer to the same thing. Or you could say "hallucination" or "revelation". Same thing, only difference that "revelation" implies that you put some deeper significance on your experience, that it has a source etc.
Sorry for the rambling, I'm not gonna go on about this much more, but I think the easiest way to type Jung is to read some of his non-technical works, for example "The undiscovered Self", a book that deals with the situation of mankind, and then just pay attention to his arguments and way of addressing the subject.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
SEI
Sir Thomas Browne: ILE
"I could never divide myself from any man upon the difference of an opinion, or be angry with his judgement for not agreeing with me in that, from which perhaps within a few days I should dissent myself."
Thus is man that great and true Amphibium, whose nature is disposed to live not only like other creatures in diverse elements, but in divided and distinguished worlds.
...Dude. Have you read Marx or know anything about his life? How the fuck do you type Marx EIE? His works are dripping in Ti. And the man was not anything close to a Fe lead.
Last edited by FreelancePoliceman; 08-05-2019 at 01:19 PM.
Psychology has just as much to do with Ne as with Ni.
Ne types automatically build mental models of how other people think and are good at deciphering people's hidden abilities. I didn't make this up, it's classical socionics―if you believe in subtypes, one of the IEE subtypes is even called "The Psychologist."
Daniel Kaluuya - LII?
possible a weird ILE
based on his appearance, I would say Se valuing tbh. it's hard for me to watch this video. whenever you think that a person is a "weird" example of a type, you might want to consider other options.
this channel probably has many alpha NT's
@soundofconfusion, I agree that Adam22 is ILE. He seems pretty typical to me. His speech patterns and the words he uses duplicate those of an ILE that I work with.
Why do you think he's a weird example of his type?
Maybe your experiences are with the other sub-type?
adam22 - mb EIE
I didn't claim that he's a weird example, consistencyofenergy did. I just highly doubt that an alpha NT would get face tattoos (tattoos are generally much more common among Se valuing types) and behave the way he does. (I didn't watch much of the video though, really not interesting for me)
Reply With Quote
