Socionics is a theory of information processing and personality type, distinguished by its information model of the psyche, called Model A, and a model of interpersonal relations. It incorporates Carl Jung's work on Psychological Types with Antoni Kępiński's theory of information metabolism. Socionics is a modification of Jung's personality type theory that uses eight psychic functions. These functions process information at varying levels of competency and interact with the corresponding function in other individuals, giving rise to predictable reactions and impressions—a theory of intertype relations.
Socionics was developed in the 1970s and '80s, primarily by the Lithuanian researcher Aušra Augustinavičiūtė, an economist, sociologist, and dean of the Vilnius Pedagogical University's department of family science. A. Augustinavičiūtė has later shortened her last name from "Augustinavichiute" to "Augusta" to make it easier to spell for foreigners. The name "socionics" is derived from the word "society", because A. Augusta believed that each personality type has a distinct purpose in society, which can be described and explained by socionics. Augusta created symbols to represent the functions described by Carl Jung and — together with a circle of fellow researchers/hobbyists — eventually created what is known as the "socionic model of the psyche" — a description of the psyche where each of the 8 information elements has its place in each person's psyche.
The central idea of socionics is that information is intuitively divisible into eight categories, called information aspects or information elements, which a person's psyche processes using eight psychological functions. Each sociotype has a different correspondence between functions and information elements, which results in different ways of perceiving, processing, and producing information. This in turn results in distinct thinking patterns, values, and responses to arguments, all of which are encompassed within socionic type. Socionics' theory of intertype relations is based on the interaction of these functions between types.
Clotheshorse is either LSE or SLE. According to Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary, a clotheshorse is a "conspicuously dressed person". It's
SacredKnowing Today, 12:34 AMGosh, whoever selected those pictures of Jack Aaron for that article on him did not like him. They are far from flattering.
The first picture
It's just a way you come across, the things that you say. dunno what point your post even had but glad you had some laughs.
Ikite iru Yesterday, 11:49 PMAccusing forum members of being right-wing conservatives on the basis of you not liking them is an interesting choice. Are you not “putting people
Poptart Yesterday, 11:46 PMAh, okay. The wording of the sentence made it sound like JOA described Assad as using social stereotyping
I think the DCNH subtypes are a subtype section in itself and might be more related to genetics. It also seems to me that every type subsection has its
Ikite iru Yesterday, 11:40 PMSo what I see with IEI most often is that when they start something they like, they become extremly obsessed. Reyes apparently spend every day playing
Ikite iru Yesterday, 11:36 PMIf one uses socionics "correctly" one shouldn't think that some "types" are more likely to commit war crimes. Models are not people,
godslave Yesterday, 11:13 PM@Enters Laughing
Did you know about this when you described him as a conservative the other day (or whenever it was, I only saw your comment
Socionist defends Hı̇tler remarks
Hmm, you're wrong about me being a right-wing conservative, Ikite iru. I haven't voted for a conservative for decades. Not since I actually bothered
Adam Strange Today, 12:34 AM