No. I don't have patients. I mainly do research.Originally Posted by Arcanum
There are 8 functions because Jung found 8 functions. Of course it seems that each function has at least a creating and accepting version of it, and also a concrete and an abstract version of it so it would be more correct to say that there are 32 functions. But why stop there? There are further distinctions between individuals in how they use their functions so why not make say each person has their own function? Basically it was just decided that a certain distinction merits to be separated as "a function" while other distinctions don't merit to be called separate functions. So the reasons are historical.
Same goes for types.
But this threas is still boring...
hmm...
Except for this:
This is weirdly hilarious. I hesitate to ask for clarification because I think understanding the sentence would spoil the hilarity. Oh, but I know you'll clarify it anyway... Damn... Do your worst!Originally Posted by Dioklecian